🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and families are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Movement

In Europe, a growing group of states are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' childhood". The policy could be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "a potential options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged the legislature to enact a proposal raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended parents to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is given. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the resolution does not create binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a useful starting point," commented the parliamentarian driving the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any action must be "based on strong data".

Earlier, support grew behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. An organization established by the family of a teenager who died after viewing dangerous online content suggests that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to create products and services that are secure and age appropriate for children," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the state level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a regulation restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures requiring parental consent for minors to open social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some individuals to follow Australia's example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Outside of Europe and the US, other countries are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies strike a more cautious position. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

As this global debate evolves, the actions of the Australian government and others demonstrate that policymakers internationally are no longer content to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.